Archive for September 2009
Daily Roundup
Posted on: September 30, 2009
Magazines Canada launches digital newsstand
Masthead Online
New York Times Still Can’t Decide How It Wants To Build A Paywall
Business Insider
Everything We Know About Apple’s Touchscreen Tablet
Wired
The Ingenious Beast
The Big Money
Disney Digitizes Classic Children’s Books For New Subscription Site
Paid Content
Study Finds Keen e-Reader Interest – 20% expect to purchase an electronic book reader this year
Twice
- In: apple | E-reader | mysterious apple things | tablet
- 4 Comments
A lot of people have been emailing me to ask about the story on Gizmodo this morning, which I feel obliged to shoot down.
Gizmodo is my favorite gadget blog and its editor, Brian Lam, is one of the best reporter/editors in Techland. But in regards to his story today, according to my sources, his sources are flat-out wrong. Apple has not been meeting with publishers to prepare them for, well, whatever it is they’re doing next.
Have people at Apple been talking to people from the NY Times? I’d be surprised if they haven’t. They always talk. Apple has excellent relationships with plenty of big media companies. But I’m told Brian incorrectly characterized the conversations that the NYT and other unnamed media have had with Apple.
In fact, I think Apple has not yet discussed the much-rumored iTablet, or whatever it is, with anyone yet—at least, not in a way that would cause a media company to act. Hell, just yesterday, in what looks like the most credible unsourced (meaning no one is speaking on the record) story yet, iLounge said Jobs hadn’t even signed off on the next device.
Of course, if indeed Apple launches something in late January, I’d be just as shocked if it didn’t have some cool app on it from the NYT or other Big Media Co. But those preparations haven’t been discussed yet.
- In: apple | apps
- Leave a Comment
I’ve been thinking a lot about why Apple rejects apps on seemingly spurious grounds, then suddenly reverses itself. What could explain some of the odd, inconsistent behavior we’ve seen? Friends who know more about this than me say that fully half of the well-publicized apps that are rejected are reversed. Usually, the reason for the rejection was a bizarre interpretation of Apple’s regs, a silly technicality, or utterly inexplicable. Why does this happen?
Here is my theory, which is total speculation, but it’s a slow day. Buyer beware:
Apple must be outsourcing/offshoring a lot of its apps review work.
All the inconsistencies suddenly make sense when viewed this way.
Plus, do the math: well over 200,000 apps have been submitted since June 30, 2008—that means Apple must well review over 650 apps A DAY, assuming five working days a week. In its FCC filing, Apple claimed it had only 40 full-time reviewers examining apps. Think of how long it takes to review every app. You must download it, put it through its paces, review the paper work, etc. Can one person really do more than 10 a day?
My theory is that there’s an A Team in Cupertino and a B Team in some other English-speaking part of the world. The A Team handles hot stuff from Fortune 500 companies and the big, branded stuff that Apple wants to get onto the platform ASAP. And the B Team handles Other. But what do I know?
Daily Roundup
Posted on: September 29, 2009
The Courier Files: How Microsoft Thinks We’ll Use Their Secret Tablet
Gizmodo
The coming tablet wars
TechCrunch
Apple App Store hits 2 billion downloads, 85,000 apps
Cnet
Amazon’s Kindle DX: Not Yet a Hit on Campus
The Wall Street Journal
Apple tablet to have non-3G model, ship in June?
Electronista
Apple Rehires a Developer of Its Newton Tablet
The New York Times
10 Reasons Why Tablets Will Succeed
PC Mag
WSJ on the Kindle, meet price elasticity
ZDnet
Fancy Charts of the Week: Mobile App Loyalty–“They Use or You Lose”
AllThingsD
News Corp: Our research proves people will pay online
Guardian
Move over, Wii — Electronic book readers poised to become this holiday’s hot ticket
Los Angeles Times
How to Market an iPhone App: Get Apple to Market Your iPhone App
AllThingsD
Daily Roundup
Posted on: September 25, 2009
Courier vs. iTablet: Portable Office or Portable Living Room?
MacNewsWorld
The Newspaper Reinvention Kit: 4 Easy Steps To Becoming A New News Organization
A presentation by CUNY’s Steve Shepard and Jeff Jarvis at the Aspen Institute’s Forum on Communication and Society
Microsoft Joins eBook Forces with O’Reilly Media
Mediabistro
Microsoft Pink: ‘Just a Sidekick’ or more?
ZDNet
Sizing Up Apple’s App Store
The Wall Street Journal
Smartphones: Is image really everything?
ZDNet
Smartphone Social Networking Surges
Adweek
Wall Street Turns Wary of Research In Motion
The Wall Street Journal
Taking on Kindle
Portfolio.com
NYT’s David Pogue hates it. So does TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington, who does the journalistic thing and discloses that he’s been working on his own tablet computer, so caveat etc.
But here’s the thing: They’re bashing this device on the grounds that it’s a terrible tablet computer. Well, that’s because it’s not a tablet computer. As I wrote earlier, it’s a digital picture frame on steroids. A new type of gadget. And as such, it’s still a pretty cool device.
Daily Roundup
Posted on: September 24, 2009
Wired Editor Chris Anderson Squares Off Against Macmillan CEO John Sargent on Free and Paid Content
Mediabistro
The HP DreamScreen Not So Dreamy
TechCrunch
The Pink Phone Pictures Microsoft Doesn’t Want You To See Yet
Gizmodo
E-Readers: The Multipurpose Competition Heats Up
BusinessWeek
Archos Unveils $500 Tablet
Wired
Before Choosing an E-Book, Pondering the Format
The New York Times
Pilot of Amazon’s Kindle e-reader launched with fall semester
Princeton University
In a survey by analysts at RBC Capital Markets, 21% of respondents said they would be interested in buying an Apple Tablet, even though a) no Tablet actually exists yet and b) they’re not sure exactly what it would do or look like and c) they’re not actually sure if or when it’s coming.
Further proof of Apple’s Halo effect: they said they would happily pay between $500 and $700 for the device.
To give this some context, according to SlashGear, a similar study in April 2007 showed that 9% of respondents said they would be interested in buying an iPhone prior to the smartphone’s launch. And look what happened there.

